In today’s interconnected business world, one of the most debated aspects of compensation strategy is location-based pay differentials. Companies routinely offer vastly different salaries for identical roles based solely on where employees are located. A software engineer in San Francisco might earn $180,000 annually, while their counterpart performing the same work in Austin, Texas, receives $130,000, and a colleague in Bangalore, India, earns $40,000. This practice raises fundamental questions about fairness, market dynamics, and the future of work in an increasingly remote-first economy.
Compensation
Why Location-Based Cost of Living Adjustments Don't Make Economic Sense
An analysis of why companies’ practice of adjusting salaries based on geographic location creates perverse incentives and fails to achieve true pay equity.